|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education 5(1): 65-76, 2016 - The purpose of this study was to identify whether a novice teachers have a self-esteem while teaching physical education. This study access the level of self-esteem among novice teachers between gender and option teachers teach in physical education. This study is a quantitative research survey and this study design is selected using questionnaires based on Rosenberg self-esteem scale for collecting data. 30 novice physical education teachers have been selected from one of the schools in the district of Sepang, Selangor. 15 males and 15 female teachers were randomly selected from the target group. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 22.0 for frequency distribution, mean, standard deviation and independent sample t-test to measure the level of self-esteem of teachers with the dependent variable. The study found that there was no significant difference between the level of self-esteem between genders. While in terms of options, there are significant differences in the level of self-esteem for non-option physical education teachers. The selfesteem level among novice teachers are very important to enhance the quality of learning, especially in the subjects of physical education |
| References |
1. Baunmeister, R.F., Campbell, J.D., Krueger, J.I., & Vohs, K.D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4(1). Pp.1-44. 2. Campbell, P.B., & Clewell, B.C (1999). Science, math, and girls… still a long way to go. Education Week, 19, 50-52. 3. Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco, CA:W. H. Freeman. 4. Covert, J. R. (1986). A study of the quality of teaching of beginning teachers. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education, Guelph, Ontario. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 273 604). 5. Frey, D & & Carlock, C.J. (1987). Enhancing Self-esteem. Ohio : Accelerated Development. 6. Glickman, C. D., & Tamashire, R. T. (1982). A comparison of first-year, fifth-year, and former teachers on efficacy, ego development, and problem solving. Psychology in the Schools. 19.558-562. 7. Hall, E., & Hall, C. (1988). Human relations in education. New York: Routledge. 8. Houston, W. R., & Felder, B. (1982). Break horses, not teachers. Phi Delta Kappan. 63. 457-460. 9. Hoy, W. (1968). The influence of experience on the beginning teacher. The School Review. 76. 312-323. 10. Hoy, W. K. (1969). Pupil control ideology and organizational socialization: A further examination of the influence of experience on the beginning teacher. School Review. 77.257-265. 11. Julismah (2006). Pendekatan Pengajaran, Gaya Belajar dan Jenis Penilaian dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains Sukan di Sekolah Menengah. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 12. Piirto (1999). Implications of postmodern curriculum theory for the education of the talented. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 22 (4), 324-353. 13. Rosenberg, M.(1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press. 14. Sheslow, D. (2008). The Story on Self –Esteem @ 1995-2008. The Nemours Foundation.pp,1,2 Student characteristics, and students aspirations in Ohio. 15. Siahaan, G.T. (2008). Hubungan Harga Diri Dengan Makna Hidup Pada Narapidana. Skripsi Tidak Diterbitkan Universitas Sumatera Utara. 16. Stanwyck, D. J. (1983). Self-esteem through the life span. Family and Community Health. 6 (8L 11-27. 17. Susanti. (2012). Hubungan Harga Diri Dan Psychological Well-Being Pada Wanita Lajang Ditinjau Dari Bidang Pekerjaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya Vol .1 No. 1 Hal.1-8. 18. Wagner, R (2002). CNN interview on what is self-esteem on Lary King. More self-esteem.com. 19. Walberg, H. J. (1968). Personality-role conflict and self-conception in urban practice teachers. The School Review. 7 6 .41-49. 20. Webster, M., Jr., & Sobieszek, B. (1974). Sources of self-evaluation a formal theory of significant others and social influences. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 21. Wu Tien Wu. (2000). Psychology. Journal of psychology. 22. Zeichner, K. (1980). Myths and realities: Field-based experiences in preservice teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education. 21(6), 45-47. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |